YouTube’s new algorithm wants to keep us ethically addicted

By Laura Box

Published Oct 2, 2019 at 09:52 AM

Reading time: 3 minutes

YouTube’s newest algorithm is set to make the platform even more addictive—an exciting prediction for investors who expect the changes to increase profit by tens of millions—while simultaneously promising to reduce the echo-chamber the platform has created. But can YouTube balance increasing addiction with its self-imposed ethical responsibilities? Probably not.

YouTube’s magnitude is almost inconceivable; it would take a month to watch the amount of content uploaded to the platform every two minutes. Since growing to be the second largest search engine on the planet, inferior only to its parent company Google, public demand has increased for the service to address the negative implications of its algorithm.

YouTube has come under fire for its tendency to create echo chambers; that is, once a user clicks on one type of video, it’s more likely to recommend similar videos, thus reinforcing biases and making it likely to “push users into an immersive ideological bubble,” as academic Derek O’Callaghan suggests. This phenomenon has seen led some to credit the platform with a significant role in the rise of populism.

In 2014, O’Callaghan pointed out that these echo chambers can quickly lead users into bubbles of far-right extremism. As extremist content often contravenes hate laws, videos with these views are technically illegal in the countries that YouTube has recommended them in. Despite these warnings, which emerged 5 years ago, research from Swansea University earlier this year found that YouTube is still significantly more likely to prioritise extremist recommendations to users who had interacted with it, showing that little change has been made.

Prolific author and YouTuber Hank Green argues that the echo chamber isn’t necessarily bad for content creators, writing that “our channels are our homes on the internet, and we need to figure out how to make them safe.” He explains that this environment allows YouTube communities to feel welcomed and engaged. But the unnerving flip side is that the communities of those expressing highly controversial views also feel welcomed and engaged. Previously believed to be reserved for the shadowy corners of the internet, alt-right YouTubers, such as Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad), who has consistently made homophobic, sexist and racist comments, and sympathetically interviewed people who’ve had rape allegations against them, calling them “victims”, have been given a safe space by the platform and amassed huge followings.

Now, YouTube is claiming that the latest algorithm will reduce this echo chamber.

While this appears positive on the surface, there’s evidence that YouTube’s attempts to rectify past public frustrations have merely been band-aid solutions. After studies indicated that the majority of climate content on YouTube was by climate deniers, public outrage pushed YouTube to prioritise videos from legitimate climate sources. Now when users search “Climate change is a hoax”, legitimate, factual information and embarrassed climate deniers are among the first to appear. Despite this, climate change denial videos still quickly rack up, not only views, but overall positive perceptions. Within a week, a denial video (avoid the comment section if you value your mental health) received over 100K views and thousands of likes, showing that the echo chamber on these videos is truly alive and well.

This is the suspicious and irksome nature of YouTube. On the surface, it appears ethically conscious by hiding videos that spread false information, yet it’s apparent that alt-right and scientifically misinformed content makers are still somehow rewarded by its algorithm.

YouTube’s business model has been built around incentivising creators of shocking and controversial content. The platform has not only allowed misogynist, racist and homophobic content to stay online, but it has monetised this content. The platform rewards YouTubers, regardless of the harm their belief systems create, as long as their content is shocking and controversial enough to garner significant views.

YouTube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki recently declared that the company is taking steps to improve its platform in an acknowledgement of social responsibilities. She outlined four “Rs” it will use to do so: Remove (harmful content), Raise (authoritative voices), Reduce (recommendations of harmful content), and Reward (those with videos at a certain standard).

But she forgot YouTube’s fifth and most important R: Revenue.

For a platform that has built its success on the innate nature of its current algorithm, it seems pretty unlikely that YouTube will jeopardise this model. It’s likely that the changes will simply provide surface-level solutions to placate the concerned public, while any genuine self-imposed social responsibility will be outweighed by the capital their algorithm craves.

Keep On Reading

By Abby Amoakuh

Crunchy, silky, scrunchie and almond moms: What’s behind TikTok’s latest parenting craze?

By Charlie Sawyer

How much is the morning after pill and why are we still paying for it?

By Abby Amoakuh

Boris Johnson’s new gig at GB News is a match made in problematic heaven

By Charlie Sawyer

Why did Jeremy Allen White and Addison Timlin divorce? Tracking the actor’s dating history up to Rosalía

By Charlie Sawyer

364 days away from election day, Trump leads the 2024 US presidential election polls 

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Former Cloudflare employee Brittany Pietsch goes viral after filming brutal firing process

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Two duvets, one love: How the Scandinavian sleep method transformed my nights

By Charlie Sawyer

Here’s how Jacob Elordi went from just a pretty face to most promising movie star

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Husband sues tech company after wife burned and killed by surgical robot

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Tayo Awoderu, player 107 in Squid Game: The Challenge, shares his behind-the-scenes experience

By Fatou Ferraro Mboup

Mom breaks into school and brutally assaults daughter’s teacher in front of 25 children

By Fleurine Tideman

I love you Barbie, but we need Feral Women Media now more than ever

By Abby Amoakuh

Suki Waterhouse expecting first child with Robert Pattinson, flaunts baby bump in sparkly dress

By Abby Amoakuh

The most controversial Supreme Court cases that lie ahead and what they mean for the US

By Charlie Sawyer

You are shaming me: Nancy Mace calls news presenter disgusting for rape-shaming her over Trump

By Abby Amoakuh

Bobbi Althoff thrown out of Drake’s SXSW party attending uninvited reignites affair rumours

By Abby Amoakuh

Pro-suicide website finally blocked by broadband providers after being linked to 50 deaths in the UK

By Abby Amoakuh

Video of Donald Trump accusing Barack Obama of founding ISIS goes viral days after Moscow attack

By Alma Fabiani

Teacher tragically found dead at scene of nativity play at UK private school

By Abby Amoakuh

Billionaire exposed as first man Ghislaine Maxwell forced Virginia Giuffre to sleep with